PIC 1 Comments - CLOSED

The Preferred Alternative Solution (a reduced widening of the ROW to accommodate a 2 lane + center turn lane, and active transportation facilities) was presented in this PIC. It strives to best balance future traffic needs against existing uses, natural features, and other constraints in the study area. Do you believe that this preferred alternative presented achieves the best balance possible? Could it be improved?

The presentation discussed features, uses and constraints within the study area that are being considered in the planning and designing the widening of Glancaster Road (like the residential areas, the woodlot, and the hydro corridor). Was there anything significant within the study area that you are aware of that you did not see in the presentation? If yes, how do you feel this would impact the design?

This project is studying the implementation of a number of key pieces of infrastructure, including a wider road, active transportation, and municipal services (water, wastewater, and stormwater) in the study area. Is there anything regarding the implementation of these pieces of infrastructure on Glancaster Road that you would like to share with the project team?